(1) The acronyms EU ETS stands for European
Union Emissions Trading Systems (EUETS). The EU Emissions Trading System is the
cornerstone of the European Union’s policy to combat climate change and at the
same time, reduce industrial greenhouse gas emissions cost effectively. The EU
ETS is the multi-country system in the world, covering 11,000 power stations
and industrial plants in 30 European zone countries whose carbon emissions make
up about 50% of Europe’s total.
The
European Union Emissions Trading System works on a “Cap and trade” system. In
other words, there is a cap or limit on the total amount of certain greenhouse
gases that can be emitted by the factories, power plants and other
installations in the system. Within this cap, companies receive emission
allowances which they can sell to or buy from one another as needed.
(2) Other countries, particularly the United
States are opposed to the EU ETS on several grounds: (1) the policy will
negatively impact the United States economic growth, (2) the policy fails to
require developing countries participation in emission cutbacks in the same
time frame as cutbacks in developed countries, (3) this makes it more difficult
for the United States to sustain tax cuts and promote retirement security, (4)
it impacts significantly on U.S. households economic well-being and living
standards, as well as negatively affect the distribution of income, and finally,
(5) it reduces wage growth.
(3). The United States current position on EU
ETS is one protest and disbelief.
(4). With minor changes due to the economic
crisis facing the European Union, the EU ETS current position is “if it ain’t
broke, don’t fix it.” As such, EU ETS has expanded its operations to include petrochemicals,
ammonia and aluminum industries and additional gases in 2013. At the same time,
a series of important changes to the way EU ETS works is expected to take place
to strengthen the system. Due to its success, hopes to link up with compatible
systems around the world to form the backbone of a global carbon market.
(5). ICAO should promote a more proactive
safety system to develop efficient and effective solutions to meet the needs of
the evolving international air transportation system.
(6). Is a system to aviation emissions
necessary? Why or why not? No, it is not necessary. It is controversial and has
met stiff resistance from the rest of the world. On January 2012 carbon
emissions was extended to cover aviation, making all airlines to acquire and
surrender allowances for carbon emissions produced by their flight, if not all
airlines would be fined. Since then, the United States, India, Russia, China
and other countries have vowed not to comply.
Directive
2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 October 2003, Journal
of the European Union.
Ahhh...but just because something is controversial and met with resistance doesn't necessarily mean that it is not necessary.
ReplyDeleteWhat is your stance on what ICAO should do regarding an ETS type of system?
ReplyDeleteA proactive safety system is a great idea for ICAO to develop. Helping to improve the ICAO members emissions would greatly help the environment.
ReplyDelete